EVE Search - New Dev Blog: Those anomaly changes in full

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

New Dev Blog: Those anomaly changes in full

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 5 post(s)
Terianna Eri Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn	Posted - 2011.03.25 19:11:00 - [1] whelp guess it's time to go back to running level4s better isk than sharing the 4 good anoms we'll have in the future with the other 500 members of my alliance gj ccp really shaking things up ________________ Originally by: CCP Incognito PS the "time to P*nis" is the shortest time recorded in human history. :)
Terianna Eri Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn	Posted - 2011.03.25 22:10:00 - [2] Originally by: Liang Nuren We afforded faction fit pimp ** before sanctums, you know. I didn't. Spin it any way you want it - it's easier, safer, and more profitable to just have a jump clone back in empire than it is to run bad anomalies in 0.0, let alone try to take better (LOL) space from alliances that are both larger and better funded. Is it possible to kick someone out of their better space and take it? Yes, of course. But just going back to Empire is not only easier, but probably more lucrative anyway. P.S. Nerfing players' personal incomes only makes them less inclined to risk ships. Enjoy even more incentives to fly in huge, risk-free blobs. ________________ Originally by:** CCP Incognito PS the "time to P*nis" is the shortest time recorded in human history. :)
Terianna Eri Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn	Posted - 2011.03.26 01:07:00 - [3] Originally by: Liang Nuren some words It may surprise you but most people are not as SUPER ELITE GOOD AT MAKING ISK WITH EVERY POSSIBLE ECONOMICALLY VIABLE WAY that you are. To those of us who are not good at the market or turning LP into isk, and dont have a lot of time to PVE, anomalies are a godsend. This should be obvious to someone as "knowledgable" as you. This change flat out completely ruins my ability to reliably make decent isk in 0.0. This is not negotiable. The only rational option to make isk at that point is to return to empire. ________________ Originally by: CCP Incognito PS the "time to P*nis" is the shortest time recorded in human history. :)
Terianna Eri Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn	Posted - 2011.03.26 18:47:00 - [4] Originally by: Malcanis Utterly, utterly shameless CCP fellatio Get **ed. Forcing people who hold bad 0.0 space to move to empire to get anywhere near the same income is not a good change. It means fewer people living in 0.0, which means fewer people able to respond when roaming gangs come through, and fewer incentives to go out roaming anyway (since there's nobody out there to shoot). ________________ Originally by:** CCP Incognito PS the "time to P*nis" is the shortest time recorded in human history. :)
Terianna Eri Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn	Posted - 2011.03.26 18:54:00 - [5] Originally by: Florestan Bronstein Short-sighted nonsense Because if people are already reluctant to PVP because losing their ship is actually a significant loss, making it take 3-4-5x longer to replace a ship is going to be GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! for encouraging more PVP!!!! Or we'll just put all our guys into T1 cruisers!! 20 T1 cruisers is pretty good... Unless you compare it to the fleets of 20 HAC/20 T3 that currently everyone can support, thanks to system upgrades. Did you know that one fully upgraded system is already way worse than a decent level 4 agent? You can make about the same isk/hour all told (counting LP of course) but the 0.0 can support maybe 2-3 making that much, whereas a level 4 agent can support infinity people. Hell, if I wanted to just make a ton of isk, i'd live in Empire. I do my PVE in nullsec because it's more convenient, not because it's more lucrative. ________________ Originally by: CCP Incognito PS the "time to P*nis" is the shortest time recorded in human history. :)
Terianna Eri Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn	Posted - 2011.03.28 20:48:00 - [6] CCP: Here's an awful idea Playerbase: 30 pages of generally articulate feedback why the idea is awful in many different ways and will accomplish the opposite of what it intends to do AND reverse the entire point of the Dominion expansion (getting people into 0.0) CCP: nope we know better and we're doing it anyway Playerbase: would you like to explain why CCP: no I wish there were a middle finger emote. This is disgusting. ________________ Originally by: CCP Incognito PS the "time to P*nis" is the shortest time recorded in human history. :)
Terianna Eri Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn	Posted - 2011.03.28 21:52:00 - [7] Edited by: Terianna Eri on 28/03/2011 21:54:05 I might also suggest that you put some thought into your customer feedback beyond "oh they're just mad we're taking away their sanctums, ignore them, they'll get over it," since that's the only thing I can think of that would justify (hah) the amount of communication we're receiving. AND MAYBE EXPLAIN YOUR REASONING SO THAT US PUNY NON GAME DESIGNER MORTALS HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT IN THE WORLD YOU'RE THINKING, THAT MIGHT BE GOOD TOO I mean obviously the "no you're wrong and we're right because we're right" is a good way to convince a six year old but when dealing with, I dunno, 12 year olds (and the 20-30 year olds that fund your company) that maybe providing some actual reasoning and thought could be a good idea just sayin throwin it out there think about it (seriously can you please explain what led you to this conclusion) P.S. dont get discouraged at least you're not at the Bioware level of handling feedback ________________ Originally by: CCP Incognito PS the "time to P*nis" is the shortest time recorded in human history. :)
Terianna Eri Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn	Posted - 2011.03.28 22:20:00 - [8] Originally by: VIncent Vance im a clueless idiot / so desperate for attention i'll troll a 99.5% unanimous thread fyp ________________ Originally by: CCP Incognito PS the "time to P*nis" is the shortest time recorded in human history. :)
Terianna Eri Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn	Posted - 2011.03.30 02:37:00 - [9] So how about those regions that are going to be getting massively boosted? Aren't the top 5 "most improved" regions (or really, "least screwed") the Drone regions? Going to make it even easier for players (bots) to get all the mins to make (and sell for $$$) supercaps, are we? Or putting all the "more desirable" space in the drone regions where actually dealing with the hundreds (thousands?) of cubic meters of alloys dropped by a drone sanctum is not only a pain in the butt, but maybe not even worth it unless you have a marauder or a 2nd account ( :tinfoil: ) to loot while you kill things? ________________ Originally by: CCP Incognito PS the "time to P*nis" is the shortest time recorded in human history. :)
Terianna Eri Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn	Posted - 2011.03.30 07:31:00 - [10] Edited by: Terianna Eri on 30/03/2011 07:32:27 What if we replaced the missing havens/sanctums with additional forlorn/forsaken hubs, which are actually worth running? (I swap to them if I warp to a Sanctum with 1-3 people in it already) That would still sting (since it means less isk/hour per person and reduces the number of players a system can support at one time), but it still brings in reasonable income, and means that more than 1-2 people can make good isk out of the anoms in a system at a time. Not as much as level4s, but with increased convenience (as you dont have to deal with LP, and also you don't have to move out of 0.0 to make isk), but it would also make the regions with better space 'more valuable' enough for people to want to fight over them. Of course, since big wars aren't funded by ratting, but by moongoo, it still won't work as intended, but at least it won't be so awful for the alliances that do end up staying in 0.0. ________________ Originally by: CCP Incognito PS the "time to P*nis" is the shortest time recorded in human history. :)

Terianna Eri Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn	Posted - 2011.03.30 21:06:00 - [11] Originally by: Marconus Orion please give me attention i'll even use red letters for it The crux of the matter is that sanctums were BARELY better than level4s as it is. Making vast regions of 0.0 worse then Empire can't possibly do anything good for the game. Why should I make less isk/hour in 0.0 when i could do it in highsec with less risk? Why should a group of people share the bad anoms in 0.0 when a single level4 system can support infinity people making better isk/hour? ________________ Originally by: CCP Incognito PS the "time to P*nis" is the shortest time recorded in human history. :)

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.